Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Users Online: 470 | Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 3-10

Botanical identity of plant sources of Daśamūla drugs through an analysis of published literature


Centre For Pharmacognosy, Pharmaceutics, Pharmacology, Centre For Ism Informatics, Institute of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine (Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions), Banglaore, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Padma Venkatasubramanian
Director, Institute of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions, No. 74/2, Jarakabande Kaval, Post Attur, via Yelahanka, Bangalore - 560 106, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: National Medicinal Plants Board, New Delhi, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0257-7941.113790

Rights and Permissions

Background: Daśamūla (DM) is a top-traded group of medicinal plants used by the Ayurvedic industry. Through literature survey and analysis, this article has enlisted the botanical sources of DM, as correlated by several scholars. Such a list is not available from any single, earlier publication. It brings to light the confusion that exists in terms of botanical sources correlated to Ayurvedic entities. There is quite a bit of difference in the botanical correlation, parts, and substitutes reported in the different scholarly works, particularly for Pṛṣṇiparī, and Agnimantha. For e.g., is Uraria picta the original intended Pṛṣṇiparī, as the Ayurvedic Formulary of India (AFI) stipulates or is it U. lagopoidiodes or Desmodium gangeticum as other scholars report? While AFI provides two botanical correlations to Agnimantha in its two editions, namely Premna integrifolia and Clerodendrum phlomidis, other scholars correlate it to other Premna and Clerodendrum species. Why has AFI provided stem bark and whole plant as substitutes for roots of DM? Are substitutes recommended by AFI only for ecological or practical convenience or is there an Ayurvedic or pharmacological explanation for the same? Aim: There are many species used in the name of Daśamūla,, in this article all the species are listed out to find the differences in the usage of the drugs. Materials and Methods: Ayurveda texts and lexicons along with the texts which have done correlation work were considered to arrive at a list of various species used as Dasmula. Results and Conclusion: Since neither the methodology nor the logic behind the correlation have been discussed in these scholarly works, including the AFI, the same is not available for analysis or scrutiny. Such a list as provided in this article can form an essential base for a much needed systematic approach at etymological analysis, botanical correlation, and further scientific work to establish legitimacy of substitutes prescribed.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2077    
    Printed67    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded352    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal